Climate change computer projections are manifestly false and dangerously misleading

by W. Kininmonth, Feb 19, 2026 in Clintel.org


 

6. Carbon dioxide has little influence on Earth’s surface temperature. Earth’s surface temperature is elevated because the radiation emissions from the greenhouse gases, clouds, and aerosols reaching the surface reduce the net longwave radiation loss from the surface. Additional carbon dioxide concentration in the atmosphere has little impact on surface temperature because there is little change in longwave radiation reaching the tropical surface as carbon dioxide concentration increases. The calculations below are made using the MODTRAN radiation transfer model and are for the tropical atmosphere with no clouds and constant temperature. Since industrialisation, for each 100ppm increase in carbon dioxide concentration the increase in radiation emitted by the greenhouse gases and reaching the surface was about 0.6W/m2. That is an increase of 0.3 percent of the radiation emitted by water vapour. Note that from the last glacial maximum 20,000 years ago to preindustrial times the carbon dioxide concentration increased from near 200ppm to near 300ppm (an increase of only 100ppm). During this period the polar ice sheets covering much of North America and northern Europe melted and sea level rose about 130 metres. Since industrialisation the carbon dioxide has increased by more than 100ppm, but sea level rise has been insignificant. The evidence does not suggest carbon dioxide concentration is influential in changing Earth’s climate.

India Doubles Down On Coal And Natural Gas As Climate Goals Recede

by V. Jayaraj, Feb20, 2026 in ClimateChangeDispatch


india coal mining
In 2022, Alex Epstein released “Fossil Future,” his treatise on why humanity requires more coal, oil, and natural gas to flourish. When the book appeared, the Biden administration was making extravagant pledges to fund global climate initiatives. [some emphasis, links added]

Executives of major financial institutions and energy firms were making theatrical commitments to reducing their use and production of fossil fuels.

But four years later, those same industry titans are scrambling for excuses to delay or abandon net-zero goals and seeking to develop the energy sources they had publicly disavowed.

Business leaders cite supply chain complexities, technological barriers, and cost overruns. Some even acknowledge that fossil fuels are a necessity of modern life.

However, for national governments, reversing course is complicated by entanglements in the bureaucratic web of international climate agreements.

Hence, they maintain the language of action – as though they could control something as huge and complex as the climate system, while systematically securing long-term supplies of fossil fuels and expanding hydrocarbon infrastructure.

No country displays this pragmatism better than India, which has quietly delayed its net-zero commitments to a distant 2070.

Behind a green veneer, India doubles down on every form of useful hydrocarbon available.

In doing so, it has emerged as a key export market for U.S. liquified natural gas (LNG) and a bellwether for global energy reality.

Coal Reality Quashes Green Illusion